Warner Bros. Discovery: We’ve Seen This Story Before

 | Aug 10, 2022 19:15

  • Four months after closing on its acquisition of WarnerMedia, WBD looks a lot like the business’s former owner
  • Streaming does offer upside — but cord-cutting trend threatens Warner Bros. Discovery
  • History shows owning a low-growth, high-debt company is a recipe for disappointment
  • There’s an irony in Warner Bros. Discovery NASDAQ:WBD) having acquired WarnerMedia from AT&T (NYSE:T). What Warner Bros. Discovery looks like with its new asset is an awful lot like what AT&T stock looked like with it.

    Both companies faced substantial debt loads. AT&T, in fact, had the largest corporate debt load in history. Warner Bros. Discovery finished its second quarter with $53 billion in borrowings on the books.

    Both stocks looked cheap. WBD stock now trades at less than 10x next year’s consensus estimate, a multiple about in line with where T stock traded for much of the time it owned WarnerMedia (the renamed business AT&T acquired in 2018 as Time Warner).

    And the management teams of both companies argued that growth was just around the corner. In both cases, shareholders believed them, while outsiders were skeptical.

    In the case of AT&T, management clearly was wrong, and shareholders took a hit as a result. The core problem for Warner Bros. Discovery stock after second-quarter earnings is that its story so far is sounding much the same.

    h2 The Simple Case Against WBD Stock/h2

    The problem for AT&T stock was — and still is — that a low-growth, heavily-indebted company very rarely provides acceptable returns. The path is simply too narrow. Interest expense eats up cash flow; financial leverage amplifies any downturn in any part of the business.

    Second-quarter results certainly suggest that Warner Bros. Discovery is fitting that template. At the end of the quarter, debt net of cash totaled 5.0x the company’s trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). That’s one of the higher such ratios in the entire market.

    Meanwhile, pro forma for the merger, and excluding currency effects, overall revenue declined 1% year-over-year. There are some puts and takes here — notably, the timing of film releases — but, even in that context, overall growth is muted.

    The problem is that over half of revenue, and the majority of profit, comes from WBD’s networks segment. This includes the legacy Discovery properties — Discovery Channel, HGTV, Food Network, TLC – plus the jewels of the WarnerMedia portfolio, TNT and TBS.

    This business simply isn’t going to grow. It’s actually somewhat impressive that the segment grew at all (though a strong economy no doubt helped). For TNT and TBS, in particular, cord-cutting and streaming are obvious threats to networks that run largely on syndicated reruns, with little original content.

    Get The App
    Join the millions of people who stay on top of global financial markets with Investing.com.
    Download Now

    As we’ll see the numbers here perhaps can work, at least based on management forecasts. But, again, when AT&T owned these assets, the numbers worked too — at least based on management forecasts. Investors in pre-merger Discovery stock thought the same, that the stock was simply too cheap relative to the cash flow the business could throw off.

    T stock was one of the more disappointing names of the 2010s, providing minimal (at best) total returns even with its high dividend. Save for a crazy run in 2021, a run driven by the hedge fund Archegos Capital before it went bust, Discovery stock did nothing for years; it’s now down more than two-thirds from where it traded in 2014.